Best ASUS and MSI Gaming Monitors (2026) Compared

ASUS and MSI both cover the full range of gaming monitors, and the practical split is this: ASUS offers the strongest high-end OLEDs in its ROG Swift line plus fast 24-inch esports panels in ROG Strix and TUF Gaming, while MSI covers value 4K IPS with the MAG series and premium OLED with the MPG series. Reviewers more often rank ASUS ROG Swift models first, and MSI models usually appear as strong alternatives with comparable specs and longer burn-in warranty marketing.

How the Product Lines Are Organized

ASUS splits its gaming monitors into ROG Swift (flagship OLED and high-end), ROG Strix (performance and esports) and TUF Gaming (budget to mid-range). MSI uses MPG for premium models, MAG for mainstream and G-series for entry level. Model codes carry the key information: for example, ASUS PG27UCDM means a 27-inch UHD (4K) OLED, and MSI MPG 321URX indicates a 32-inch 4K OLED, though the exact meaning of suffixes is not standardized.

ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQ3A 27 Inch 1440p 180Hz G-SYNC Gaming Monitor | Fast IPS, ELMB Sync, 1ms, 130% sRGB, Built-In Speakers, FreeSync Premium, HDR10, for PS5 and Xbox, 3yr warranty

Chosen because it specifies Fast IPS and ELMB Sync.

View on Amazon →

ASUS ROG XG27AQDMGR 27 Inch 1440p 240Hz Glossy OLED HDR Gaming Monitor | 0.03ms, OLED Care Pro, TrueBlack Glossy, Neo Proximity Sensor, ELMB Sync, DisplayHDR 400, DCI-P3 99%, for PS5 and Xbox

Chosen because it specifies 0.03ms and OLED Care Pro.

View on Amazon →

msi - MAG 272FB E20 27" Rapid IPS LCD FHD 200Hz 0.5ms Adaptive Sync Gaming Monitor with HDR Ready(DisplayPort, HDMI) - Black

Chosen because it specifies HDMI) and Black.

View on Amazon →

ASUS ROG XG27ACS 27 Inch 1440p 180Hz USB-C G-SYNC HDR Gaming Monitor | DisplayHDR 400, sRGB 133%, 1ms (GTG), Fast IPS, ELMB Sync, AI Gaming, Free Sync, for PS5 and Xbox

Chosen because it specifies DisplayHDR 400 and sRGB 133%.

View on Amazon →

ASUS Models

ROG Swift OLED PG27UCDM (27 inch QD-OLED)

ASUS lists a 4th-generation QD-OLED panel at 4K and 240Hz with 0.03ms response, 166 PPI, DisplayPort 2.1 (80 Gbps), two HDMI 2.1 ports, USB-C with 90W power delivery, a 100 x 100mm VESA pattern, DisplayHDR 400 True Black, HDR10 and Dolby Vision. RTINGS names it the best 27-inch gaming monitor it has reviewed.

ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM Gen3 (32 inch QD-OLED)

RTINGS calls this the best gaming monitor it has reviewed, a 4K 240Hz QD-OLED. A comparison article reports it with Dolby Vision support and the most complete port selection of three 32-inch 4K OLEDs. As ASUS sells several revisions of the PG32UCDM, confirm that a listing says Gen3 if that is the one you want.

ROG Strix OLED XG32UCWMG (32 inch WOLED)

A glossy WOLED that runs 4K at 240Hz or 1080p at 480Hz, switchable by hotkey. ASUS lists a 0.03ms response rate, DisplayPort 1.4 with DSC, HDMI 2.1, USB-C and OLED Care Pro with a proximity sensor that blanks the screen when you step away. TFTCentral reports a 48 to 240Hz VRR range in native mode, TweakTown awarded it an Editor’s Choice, and TechSpot names it its best overall OLED while noting slightly lower gamut than QD-OLED.

ROG Strix XG259CMS (24.5 inch)

The listing shows a 1920 x 1080 Fast IPS panel at up to 310Hz with 1ms GtG, 400 cd/m2, 110% sRGB, VESA DisplayHDR 400, FreeSync Premium and G-Sync Compatible, with one USB-C, one DisplayPort 1.4 and one HDMI 2.0. It targets competitive players who want a small, fast screen.

TUF Gaming VG249Q3A (23.8 inch)

ASUS lists a 1080p Fast IPS panel at 180Hz with 1ms GtG, 99% sRGB, 250 cd/m2, ELMB, FreeSync Premium, one DisplayPort 1.2, two HDMI 2.0 and speakers. The stand tilts only, with a 100 x 100mm VESA mount, and ASUS says it does not support HDMI 2.1. One retailer lists it as end of life, so it may be replaced by a newer TUF model.

MSI Models

MPG 321URX QD-OLED (32 inch)

MSI lists a 31.5-inch flat QD-OLED at 3840 x 2160, 240Hz, 0.03ms GtG, with one DisplayPort 1.4a, two HDMI 2.1 ports (4K 240Hz), and USB-C with DP alt mode and 90W power delivery. It carries DisplayHDR True Black 400 with about 1000 nits peak. RTINGS reports very low input lag and crisp motion, though it says the Alienware AW3225QF is better if image quality is the priority. Club386 reports 93% AdobeRGB and 97% DCI-P3 and highlights OLED Care and a three-year warranty.

MPG 272URX (27 inch OLED)

PCWorld picks this 26.5-inch 4K 240Hz OLED as its best gaming monitor overall. It is the 27-inch counterpart to the 321URX.

MAG 275UPD E14 (27 inch IPS)

MSI lists a 27-inch 4K IPS panel at 144Hz with a dual mode that switches to 1080p at 288Hz, HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 1.4a, DisplayHDR 400, FreeSync Premium, 1ms MPRT and a 100 x 100mm VESA mount. Retail listings give 250 nits SDR brightness, 130% sRGB and 90% DCI-P3.

MAG 274QPF X30MV (27 inch 1440p)

Retail listings show a 27-inch 2560 x 1440 panel at 300Hz with 0.5ms response, HDMI 2.1 and DisplayPort 1.4a, and high-brightness figures (400 nits SDR and 1000 nits HDR). Listings are inconsistent about the panel technology, so read MSI’s own specification page before buying.

MAG 255F E20 (24.5 inch)

A listing shows a 1920 x 1080 IPS panel at 200Hz with 0.5ms GtG, HDMI 2.0b, DisplayPort 1.2a, FreeSync Premium compatibility, a tilt-only stand and a 100 x 100mm VESA mount. It is MSI’s example of a 24-inch esports-oriented monitor.

At a Glance

ASUS vs MSI: Where They Differ

• Review standing: RTINGS ranks ASUS ROG Swift models at the top of its gaming monitor lists, while MSI models appear as runners-up.
• Ports: The ASUS PG27UCDM lists DisplayPort 2.1; the MSI MPG 321URX lists DisplayPort 1.4a. Both offer HDMI 2.1 and 90W USB-C.
• Burn-in cover: Tom’s Hardware reports that ASUS first offered two years and MSI three, and that MSI’s terms void the cover if OLED Care is disabled. Read both makers’ current written terms for your model.
• Dual-mode: ASUS’s XG32UCWMG uses 4K 240Hz and 1080p 480Hz; MSI’s MAG 275UPD E14 uses 4K 144Hz and 1080p 288Hz.

Pick X If…

Compatibility and Setup Notes

• Cables and ports: 4K at 240Hz needs DisplayPort 2.1, or DisplayPort 1.4 with Display Stream Compression. HDMI 2.1 is the port to use for current consoles, and the OLED models above list two of them.
• Mounting: The ASUS and MSI listings above use a 100 x 100mm VESA pattern. Confirm the weight rating of any monitor arm before buying.
• Stands: The 24-inch budget models listed here have tilt-only stands, so a monitor arm or a riser may be needed for comfortable height.
• GPU demand: 4K has about 2.25 times the pixels of 1440p. High refresh rates at 4K depend on a high-end graphics card, while the 24-inch 1080p models are easy to drive.
• OLED care: Leave pixel shift and refresh cycles enabled, because warranty terms can depend on them.

Alternatives

If neither brand fits, the Alienware AW2725Q is a 27-inch 4K QD-OLED at 240Hz with a three-year burn-in warranty, the Samsung Odyssey G5 G50D is a 27-inch 1440p IPS at 180Hz, and the Gigabyte M27UP is a 27-inch 4K 160Hz IPS that TechSpot calls the value pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is ASUS or MSI better for gaming monitors?

Neither is better across the board. ASUS ROG Swift models top RTINGS lists, while MSI offers comparable OLED specs and a longer burn-in warranty on some models. The right choice depends on the specific model, ports and price tier.

What is a good MSI 24-inch monitor for gaming?

The MAG 255F E20 is a 24.5-inch 1080p IPS at 200Hz in its listing. MSI’s 24-inch range changes frequently, so read the specification page for the latest model.

Which ASUS monitor is best for a general computer, not just games?

ASUS offers ProArt and ZenScreen lines for work, but within the gaming range, the PG27UCDM with USB-C 90W power delivery suits mixed use. OLED burn-in care still applies to static desktop content.

Do ASUS and MSI OLED monitors cover burn-in?

Both have offered burn-in warranties, reported at two to three years depending on model and date, with conditions. Read the warranty page for your exact model and region.

Does 4K 240Hz need DisplayPort 2.1?

No. DisplayPort 1.4 with Display Stream Compression handles it, as on the MSI MPG 321URX. DisplayPort 2.1 on the PG27UCDM carries it without compression.

Is a 24-inch monitor still worth buying?

For competitive shooters who prioritize frame rate and a compact view, yes. For general use and cinematic games, a 27-inch 1440p or 4K screen offers more sharpness and space.